No actor has ever troubled Hollywood and the rest of the world as much as Nicolas Cage. He is the perfect medium between mainstream and independent. He is a paycheck victim and the man behind every intelligently obscure film. He has made the poorest choices of project and the wisest ones at the same time. He is highly gifted but also cheesy and awkward in many of his performances. He is a great actor and the worst, simultaneously. He is a misunderstood genius and a con artist.
He is unpredictable, out of his mind and the ultimate paradox.
Nicolas Cage’s expressive eyes can take him from a sensitive role in City of Angels, to a mean Ghost Rider or a sleazy Bad Lieutenant. How he will use the meaningful sadness that his eyes exude is uncertain. Whether he’ll convince his audience or not remains to be seen. Every single time is a gamble. Some of the most incredible films include him in the cast, and more than often, well-respected filmmakers offer him the lead part. At the same time, projects that we’re trying to forget all about, and filmmakers that we find hard to respect choose him too. And this is how Nicolas Cage stars in Bangkok Dangerous and also Leaving Las Vegas. In National Treasure: Book Of Secrets and Raising Arizona. In Next and Adaptation. In Drive Angry and The Weather Man. In Season Of The Witch and Matchstick Men.
What’s even more confusing than these contradictory choices is his career as an action hero. Deciding whether you love Con Air, The Rock or Face Off can be tough – personally I find all three incredible — and one can’t help but think that this is an actor who’s playing a joke on us again and again. The lines are cheesy but still clever, the situations are hilarious and the characters, although involved in extreme fakeness and predictability, somehow become engaging and appealing. An even bigger somehow-it-works concerns the cast that often supports Nicolas Cage in such movies. It can range widely, from Eva Mendes to Sean Connery and from Amber Heard to John — Cyrus the damn Virus — Malkovich. All the supporting actors work, no matter what their style, no matter what their skills.
This is not only an actor who switches from a good film to a bad one and from a great performance to a cringe-worthy one in minutes, but he’s also an artist so complex, puzzling and ambiguous that we can’t help but second-guess ourselves every time we like or dislike one of his films. I have struggled for a long time trying to decide whether Face Off is such overly exaggerated action that it becomes annoying and tiring or simply a work of art. I have concluded the latter thanks to Nicolas Cage’s Castor Troy/Sean Archer. At the same time, I have found it tough trying to decide whether I consider John Travolta a good actor, and admittedly this question is given a definite answer when he’s put opposite Nicolas Cage as Sean Archer/Castor Troy. This is entertainment at its best.
So does this mean that Nicolas Cage has the ability to always recognize art when he sees it, grab it and take it to a higher level, while he is also able to transform junk into art or in cases, even keep it junk for cheap entertainment’s sake? It seems so. When possible, Cage opts for deep, dark, hilarious films. Other times he takes a movie with nothing to offer, loads superficial characters with emotion and humour, and ensures that his performances are passionate and exciting and that he’s the only one visible on screen. Other times he quits before he begins. And all at once, narrative shortcomings, banal characters, bad acting and awkward lines become visible. Whatever he does, he does it strongly, with confidence and willingness to accept our praise just as much as our contempt. Sometimes it feels like he even
enjoys his paradoxical career and reputation, he keeps us wondering, plays us around and tries to catch us unprepared. Needless to say, he always succeeds.
To determine what Nicolas Cage is all about is perhaps one of the hardest things in the world. Love him or hate him, this is an incredibly talented artist, an amazing entertainer and the only actor able to make a line like Why couldn’t you put the bunny back in the box? work. To say he’s versatile would be an understatement, so we’ll put him down as a true enigma, an original madman, and perhaps the only one still keeping us on our toes.
Read also:
Nicolas Cage at IMDb
Nicolas Cage at Wikipedia
Nicolas Cage (awards won and nominated for) at IMDb

dharmabob
It’s been my opinion that part of Nicholas Cage’s “Jekyll and Hyde” talent, is whether directors want him to act, or just act like Nicholas Cage.
“Just be yourself,” is not always great advice.
Angeliki Coconi
You’re right. Although sometimes he’s good without having an incredible director telling him what to do. And other times he’s bad even with great directing. This is just too confusing…
todd slutzky
This discussion can’t be complete without the truly wonderful parody video from College Humor “Nic Cage’s Agent.” Makes me laugh every time I think of it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eExfV_xKaiM
Also his incredibly strange personal life choices only add to the strangeness.
Angeliki Coconi
That’s hilarious! And yes, his personal life choices do add to the strangeness, but it’s not like he needed it. He’s been mad all along.
A.G.
Bad choices or good ones, either way… Nicolas Cage is the man.
Angeliki Coconi
He really IS the man. Couldn’t agree more.
Brian Gonigal
Just Google Image “Nicolas Cage matrix”, it says everything this article does in one simple diagram.
Angeliki Coconi
haha! I had a look at that! Amazing.
Mike
Good article, though I’m not sure how you got through it without mentioning Wicker Man. It pretty much sums up the “weird” side of his career and throw in a bear suit for good measure.
Angeliki Coconi
I know! I should have. You’re absolutely right.
Stephen Goss
Pretty sure in the case of Nic Cage, the jokes on us. I don’t think he gives a shit and is talented enough to get away with doing whatever comes his way. We applaud it and say, “All is right with the world” when it’s good, and scratch our heads when it isn’t. Then we try to analyze it, to make sense of it, when I suspect it’s just the chaos that is his life. I suspect this is a man who we don’t fully, and never will fully understand. I don’t think he’s motivated by anything logical. Reminds me of this gem, albeit in different context: “Because some men aren’t looking for anything logical, like money. They can’t be bought, bullied, reasoned or negotiated with. Some men just want to watch the world burn.” I think Nic just wants to do what he feels like, when he feels like it, and has the means and enablers to do so. Ultimate freedom. So yes, in that sense… he IS the man.
Angeliki Coconi
Wow! YOU should have written this article. You said it all so much better. The idea of Nicolas Cage sitting back and enjoying watching the world burn is just so cinematic and now I can’t get it out of my head. This is an amazing comment! Thanks so much.
Rafael Ibay
Haha, I love how that gem about “some just men wanting to watch the world burn” is a reference to Alfred describing The Joker in “The Dark Knight.” Maybe the joke is on us, after all. You got me, Mr. Cage!
Ron Barth, Jr.
Come on, now, don’t be lifting from the poor butler from “The Dark Knight!”
Angeliki Coconi
They are both facing the same problems, but I still have to take Nick’s side as the crazier of the two!…
ZacharyTF
Would you put Knowing in the good or bad category? I would put it in the good category. One of the better sci-fi films of recent years.
Angeliki Coconi
Good question! I would definitely put it in the good category. I didn’t include it because it’s a genre that he very rarely goes for, so I didn’t have much to compare it with. But it’s a really good film and he’s brilliant in it.
xoxoxoe
Nicolas Cage is the ultimate actor, and actors act in a whole lot of stuff, good and bad – they need the work. What sets Cage apart from the rest is that he brings the same intensity to every part. He never “acts” as if a role is beneath him. That’s why he is believable in every movie. It’s our problem if we want to call The Sorcerer’s Apprentice bad or Adaptation genius. It doesn’t matter to Cage. It’s not important. He was there, he was real. No matter the film, he always brings it.
Angeliki Coconi
Very true. That’s why he’s the man. Because he just does what he likes and couldn’t care less about what the world thinks. He does always bring it and we love him for that!
Gil Munk
It’s really quite simple – he’s identical twins. One is a really good actor and has a great nose for good films and roles, the other is terrible at the profession in every way.
Angeliki Coconi
So Adaptation is based on a true story then! Finally, an answer to the mystery.
Rafael Ibay
And yet, even the other terrible twin is capable of somehow transforming junk into art, somehow becoming engaging and appealing–even heartbreaking (see scene in swamp where Donald confesses, “U r wut u luv, not wut luvs u…” It really is all confusing…such is life, and such is the Nicolas Cage Paradox!
Richard Feren
How was it possible to write this without mentioning Vampire’s Kiss? If the aforementioned paradox could possibly be embodied within a single film, that would be the one. I still don’t know what to make of it, but it never disappoints. Thanks for the intriguing article.
Angeliki Coconi
Thanks for reading! Vampire’s Kiss is a tough one and that’s why I didn’t mention it. It’s the paradox on its own. Let me think about this one and write an article on it alone!
Storklor
Let’s not forget Wild At Heart. Cage + Lynch = truly incredible. Sailor is one of Lynch’s most enjoyable creations, and it makes one wonder: How much more awesome would Blue Velvet or even Twin Peaks have been with Cage in the Kyle MacLachlan roles?
Angeliki Coconi
Cage as Kyle MacLachlan! Amazing.
Wild At Heart was incredible, you’re right. It’s one of my favourite films!
Dave From Knoxville
Consider a selective filmography, and you’re looking at one of the finest film festivals among all actors currently working, with his best work spanning nearly a 30-year time frame.
1983 Valley Girl
1986 Peggy Sue Got Married
1987 Raising Arizona
1987 Moonstruck
1993 Red Rock West
1995 Leaving Las Vegas
1997 Face/Off
2002 Adaptation
2003 Matchstick Men
2110 Kick Ass
Most actors’ peak period spans 7-10 years. I put Cage at the 98th percentile in career achievement.
Angeliki Coconi
This is a great idea for a film festival Dave! Let’s do it.
Fredrik Asplund
Great piece! Linked on Sprawler!
sprawler.tumblr.com
Angeliki Coconi
Fredrik thank you so much! I’m touched…
Crispin Read
Amazing post – I loves it
So true, so very very true – I like to think that Sean Connery did The Rock because he wanted to build an extension on one of his houses and buy some new golf clubs and Nick Cage did it because he really wanted to say some of the lines in the script out loud.
Angeliki Coconi
Hahaha! That’s exactly why Nic did it. To say some of the lines out loud. Amazing interpretation!
Rafael Ibay
Thanks for this great article, Angeliki! And remember folks, it’s not overacting, it’s “mega-acting,” ha. No but seriously, I admire Nicolas Cage for challenging our perceptions of what good acting should be like–you know, typical things such as naturalistic or realistic, but that stuff’s boring if you ask me. There’s an interview where Cage addresses criticisms of being “over-the-top,” and his response is pretty illuminating. He asks us to consider that acting need be no different than painting, music, or other art forms with regard to abstraction. After all, one wouldn’t look at a painting by Picasso or listen to Bebop and dismiss it as, “oh it’s too over-the-top,” no? And so when I watch a so-called “over-the-top” performance by Cage, I believe he’s tapping into higher heights of human emotions, emotions which I feel we all feel inside but are too inhibited to express because of propriety. Indeed, in moments of personal crisis, I’ll admit to just wanting to scream, “Not the bees! NOT THE BEEEES! ARRGAHRHARGG!!” The difference between Cage and I is that he actually does it–now that’s high praise. Anyway, I hope you reconsider Vampire’s Kiss. Next to The Weather Man, I think it’s Nicky’s saddest performance. This may sound weird, but I compare it to De Niro’s turn in Taxi Driver. In that early film, in particular, you can see Cage channeling German Expressionism and all the other idiosyncratic tics that audiences and critics alike will later love (and loathe) him for, and that he will later adorably coin “Nouveau Shamanic” as his method of acting–gotta love him for that!
Also, I second there being a Nic Cage film festival. I would love to attend to it…
Angeliki Coconi
Thank you for the very insightful comments Rafael! Nicolas Cage the Picasso of cinema? Now, THAT’s an article to be written for Unsung Films. Are you on it? You’ve nailed it, so the next paradoxical and worth examining actor or filmmaker is on you. Can’t wait!
NAME1
by my opinion you’ve forgotten about his best movie ever – Lord of War…but still I agree with you 100% – one moment I love him, next moment I cannot watch him…and that is in the same movie with a couple of sceenes in between :)
Angeliki Coconi
that’s it, exactly! and yes, Lord Of War is amazing! “Where there’s a will, there’s a weapon.” Andrew Niccol gives him something great to work with, so he really does it perfectly.